Abstract:
For
thousands of years in every culture and society physical and mental differences
have been ascribed special meaning. This was usually negative and often
persists in stigma, negative attitudes and stereotypes today. People were
thought to be disabled because they or their parents had done something wrong
and all-powerful gods, deities or fate had made them disabled (karma or sin).
Disabled people were often subjected to inhuman treatment. Being seen as
bringing shame on their families, they were locked away. Euthanasia was widely
practised on babies born with significant impairments. Such children were often
abandoned and had to rely on begging to survive.11 It was believed that
disabled people brought bad luck because they had been cursed or had had a spell
placed upon them by witchcraft. They were often viewed as not fully human or
possessed by evil spirits. This made it easy to make fun of or ridicule them.
They became the butt of jokes and symbols for all the ills of the world.
Clowns, court jesters and ‘freak shows’ are illustrations of this. There are
many cultural and literary manifestations of this thinking which are still
being reinforced in myths, legend or literature. Even modern films, comics and
television programmes draw upon and reinforce these negative stereotypes.
Stereotypes are bundles of negative and untrue perceptions which often
precondition how people treat and respond to disabled people.12
In
promoting friendship and loyalty, and in safeguarding the commitment to freedom
and peace, basic education can play a Pivotal role and a vital part. This
requires, on the one hand, that the facilities of education be available to all
irrespective of caste .colour, creed and disabilities. This paper shows the
evolutionary and developmental perspectives of inclusive education in India and
over the world at large and its effective class room practices.
Introduction:
The right to live with
dignity and self-respect as a human being is a crying need of a modern civilization
which leads to continuous analysis of policies and services by the Government
aiming at the uplift of the marginalized
sections of society. National Education
Policy of our country (India) laid emphasis on ‘Equalization of Educational
Opportunity’ and ‘Universalization of Education’. So creating an inclusive
environment where children with special needs have to receive equal
opportunities in educational sphere. Several initiatives by Governments, NGOs,
INGOs, UN agencies and others have been taken to ensure special education for children
with disabilities. The genesis of special needs education in India can be
traced back to pre-independent India. There are examples in Indian history that
show that people with disabilities had educational opportunities, and that disability
did not come in the way of learning. However, during the colonial period, India
increasingly looked at educational models existing outside the country. Parents
of children with disabilities, mainly from urban areas and with exposure to
approaches prevalent in western countries, started schools for their children.
Since the government had no policy on the education of children with
disabilities, it extended grants to these private schools. This approach of setting
up separate schools, mostly residential, spread across the country, although it
was concentrated in urban areas. However, for a country the size of India,
their numbers were small. For over a century, these special schools offered the
only education available to children with disabilities because of the
widespread belief that children with special needs could not be educated
alongside others. This allowed a small number of children to have access to education
but did not help these children to enter the mainstream community after
completing their education. Now social awareness has been created to provide
inclusive education to the children with special needs to fulfil the goal of
UEE (Universalization of Elementary Education)
Historical Perspective of Inclusive Education
in India:
After independence, the
Indian Constitution directed the state to ensure provision of basic education
to all children up to the age of 14 years. The education of people with
disabilities was, however, not explicit in the early constitutional provisions
except for guaranteeing similar rights for people with disabilities as other
members of society. The Education Commission of 1966 (Kothari Commission) drew
attention to the education of children with disabilities. In 1974, for the
first time, the necessity of integrated education was explicitly emphasized
under the scheme for Integrated Education for Disabled Children (IEDC). In pursuit
of the goal of providing basic education for all, the National Policy on
Education (1986) and its follow-up actions have been major landmarks. The World
Declaration on Education for All adopted in 1990 gave further boost to the
various processes already set in motion in the country. The Rehabilitation
Council of India Act 1992 initiated a training programme for the development of
professionals to respond to the needs of students with disabilities. The
enactment of the People with Disability Act in 1996 provided legislative
support. This act makes it mandatory to provide free education to children with
disabilities in an appropriate environment until the age of 18 years. In 1999,
the government passed the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism,
Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act for the
economic rehabilitation of people with disabilities. These acts have been
instrumental in bringing about a perceptive change improvement in the attitude
of government, NGOs and people with disabilities. In recent years, two major
initiatives have been launched by the government for achieving the goals of
universalization of elementary education (UEE): the District Primary Education
Programme (DPEP) in 1994 and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in 2002. Programmes
launched in the recent past have been able to make only a limited impact in
terms of increasing the participation of children with disabilities in formal
education. This situation needs to change; a focused effort is required.
Keeping in view recent initiatives on inclusive education, a comprehensive
review is necessary to help in better understanding the present status of
education of children with disabilities, and how inclusive education can be
promoted.
Several Aspects of Inclusive Education:
The term inclusion captures,
in one word, an all-embracing societal ideology. Regarding individuals with
disabilities and special education, inclusion secures opportunities
for students with disabilities to learn alongside their non-disabled peers in
general education classrooms.
Inclusive education means that all students attend and are welcomed by
their neighbourhood schools in age-appropriate, are supported to
learn, contribute and participate in all aspects of the life of
the school. Inclusive education happens when children with and
without disabilities participate and learn together in the same classes.
Research shows that when a child with disabilities attends classes alongside
peers who do not have disabilities, good things happen.
An inclusive classroom is a general
education classroom in which students with and without disabilities
learns together. It is essentially the opposite of a special
education classroom, where students with disabilities learn with only
other students with disabilities.
Inclusive teaching strategies refer to any number
of teaching approaches that address the needs of students with a
variety of backgrounds, learning styles, and abilities. These strategies
contribute to an overall inclusive learning environment, in which
students feel equally valued
An inclusive environment requires both individual diversity
awareness, skills and effective organizational systems that support diversity
and inclusion. Cultural competence is a
set of attitudes, skills and Inclusive practice is an approach to teaching
that recognises the diversity of students, enabling all students to access
course content, fully participate in learning activities and demonstrate their
knowledge and strengths at assessment. In inclusive environment, people of
all cultural orientations can freely express who they are, their own opinions
and points of view, fully participate in teaching, learning, work and social
activities and above all feel safe from abuse, harassment or unfair criticism. Special
education is defined as “Specially designed instruction, at no cost to
parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability.”
The integrated approach is one in which learners learn by doing
in a learner centred environment in learner-interest contexts. It allows students to engage in purposeful,
relevant learning. It encourages
students to see the interconnectedness and interrelationships between the
curriculum areas.
The Integrated lesson has to be designed to meet the needs of
classroom teachers that desire to use physical activity to teach academic
content. The content can be taught in the classroom or outside in an outdoor
play area.
An inclusive society is a society that over-rides
differences of race, gender, class, generation, and geography, and ensures
inclusion, equality of opportunity as well as capability of all members of
the society to determine an agreed set of social institutions that
govern social interaction.
Full inclusion means that all students, regardless of
handicapping condition or severity, will be in a regular full time
classroom program. All services must be taken to the child in that setting.
Through the implementation of integrated curriculum, teachers help kids
see the connections and relevance between
subjects. Integrated curriculum is a student-centered approach
to teaching. In teaching with an interdisciplinary approach,
students are often given a choice, making the subject inherently more
meaningful.
International
Approach to Inclusive Education:
Education is a human
right and therefore we expect that all children, regardless of their social
status, gender and physical or any other disability, should have access to
quality education. Education for All (EFA) and the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) in education are major international commitments forwarded by our country
in International Forum for the achievement of free, compulsory and universal
primary education for all children and the elimination of gender disparities in
education at all levels.
At the 17th Commonwealth Conference of Education
Ministers, held in South Africa in 2006, ministers agreed to sustain and
accelerate their governments’ efforts to attain EFA and the education MDGs.
They also directed the Commonwealth Secretariat to provide regular reports on Common
wealth progress towards achieving these objectives, and to give priority to
member countries that were at risk of failing to achieve them.
The adoption of the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, and in
particular Article 24, which requires the development of an inclusive education
system for all children, presents both a challenge and an opportunity to
the countries of the Commonwealth.
United
Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities,
Article
24
1. States Parties
recognize the right of persons with disabilities to education. With a view to
realizing this right without discrimination and on the basis of equal Opportunity,
States Parties shall ensure an inclusive education system at all levels and
life long learning directed to:
(a) The full
development of human potential and sense of dignity and self-worth, and the
strengthening of respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and human diversity;
(b) The development by
persons with disabilities of their personality, talents and creativity, as well
as their mental and physical abilities, to their fullest potential;
(c) Enabling persons
with disabilities to participate effectively in a free society.
2. In realizing this
right, States Parties shall ensure that:
(a) Persons with
disabilities are not excluded from the general education system on the basis of
disability, and that children with disabilities are not excluded from free and
compulsory primary education, or from secondary education, on the basis of
disability;
(b) Persons with
disabilities can access an inclusive, quality and free primary education and
secondary education on an equal basis with others in the communities in which
they live;
(c) Reasonable
accommodation of the individual’s requirements is provided;
(d) Persons with
disabilities receive the support required, within the general education system,
to facilitate their effective education;
(e) Effective
individualized support measures are provided in environments that maximize
academic and social development, consistent with the goal of full inclusion.
3. States Parties shall
enable persons with disabilities to learn life and social development skills to
facilitate their full and equal participation in education and as members of
the community. To this end, States Parties shall take appropriate measures,
including:
(a) Facilitating the
learning of Braille, alternative script, augmentative and alternative modes,
means and formats of communication and orientation and mobility skills, and
facilitating peer support and mentoring;
Four
key -elements defined by UNESCO:
UNESCO
has identified four key elements that have featured strongly in inclusion
practices across all disadvantaged groups:
•
Inclusion is a process: Inclusion has to be seen as a never ending search to
find better ways of responding to diversity. It is about learning how to
appreciate differences and learn from diversity. In this way, differences come
to be seen more positively, as a stimulus for fostering learning among both
children and adults.
•
Inclusion is concerned with the identification and removal of barriers:
Consequently, it involves collecting, collating and evaluating information from
a wide variety of sources in order to plan for improvements in policy and
practice. It is about using evidence of various kinds to stimulate creativity
and problem solving.
•
Inclusion is about the presence, participation and achievement of all students:
‘Presence’ is concerned with where - children are educated, and how reliably
they attend; ‘participation’ relates to the quality of their experiences while
they are present and must incorporate the views of the learners themselves;
‘achievement’ is about outcomes of learning across the curriculum, not merely
tests or examination results.
• Inclusion involves a
particular emphasis on those groups of learners who may be at risk of
marginalisation, exclusion or under-achievement. This indicates that there is a
moral responsibility to ensure that those groups that are statistically most
‘at risk’ are carefully monitored and that where necessary steps are taken to
ensure their presence, participation and achievement in the education system
Progress
in Inclusive Education in India:
There
are up to 50 million disabled children in India and fewer than 10 per cent
attend elementary school (Peters, 2003). NCERT (1998) reported that 20 million
children require special needs education, but as the enrolment of disabled
children is 5 per cent, compared to 90 per cent for non-disabled children, this
is a big underestimate. A recent World Bank study (2007) showed that gender
differences are less between disabled boys and girls, reflecting low attendance
levels. Illiteracy is 52 per cent for disabled people, compared to 35 per cent
in the general population, and in all Indian states the proportion of children
with disabilities who do not attend school is 5.5 times that of the general
population. Even in the best performing states, a significant proportion of
out-of school children are disabled (in Kerala 27 per cent and in Tamil Nadu
over 33 per cent).
Historically,
NGOs established special schools on the European model. There are now 2,500
special schools, but it has become apparent that such schools can only cater
for a small minority of disabled children. An integration programme has
gradually developed, but without any training or support in the mainstream. The
Government of India is committed to universal elementary education. The
constitutional right was given new impetus with the 86th amendment: ‘The State
shall provide free and compulsory education to all children aged six to
fourteen years in such a manner as the State may, by law, determine’.
The
District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) set up by the Government was launched
in 1994. It is a decentralised programme. Starting in one or two blocks in each
state, with one or two clusters of districts, it has now reached the majority
of districts, especially in the most backward areas.
In
1997, disabled children were explicitly included in the DPEP. Initially, the
focus was on children with mild or moderate learning difficulties. Recently
this has been extended to the full range and severity of impairments. In the
first six years, 877,000 disabled children were identified across India and
621,760 were enrolled. Through a combination of state, regional and district
resource centres and widespread in-service teacher training, practice has begun
to change significantly. By 2003 over 1 million teachers had received one day’s
training, 171,000 had attended three- to five-day orientation courses and over
4,000 had attended a 45-day orientation course to become master trainers.
Different states have adopted different models for training, some relying on
NGOs, some on consultants and others on full-time district officers. The
project has identified the following key aspects of training for inclusive
education:
Key
steps for Inclusive education:
• Awareness generation
• Community
mobilisation – especially of parents
• Early detection of
impairment
• In-service teacher
training
• Resource support
• Curriculum adaptation
• Multi-Sectoral
convergence
• Provision of
essential assistive services, aids and appliances
• Removal of
architectural barriers (Government of India, 2003).
DPEP
Programme:
The DPEP has set up alternative schools programme
to ensure Education for all at the elementary stage. This provides schools for
children aged 6–14 years old, organised flexibly to meet local conditions,
which open for four hours a day in single or double shifts. Each school has two
teachers, one of whom must be female so that girls are encouraged to attend and
their particular needs are met. So far, 200,000 schools have been built
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan: SSA (Education for All), was
launched by the Government, aims to provide eight years of elementary schooling
for all children, including children with disabilities, in the 6–14 age group
by 2010. The programme provides an additional Rs1200 per ‘challenged’ child to
meet additional needs Children with disabilities in the 15–18 age group are
given free education under the Integrated Education for Disabled Children
(IEDC) Scheme. Under SSA, a continuum of educational options, learning aids and
tools, mobility assistance and support services are being made available to
students with disabilities. They include education through an open learning
system and open schools, alternative schooling, distance learning, special
schools, home-based education, itinerant teachers, remedial teaching, part-time
classes, CBR and vocational education.
However,
overall, the spending share on inclusive education in SSA is low – only 1 per cent.
There is a big variation in inclusive education spending between states,
ranging from 5 per cent of total spending on education in Kerala to under 0.5
per cent in Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Rajasthan.
The
Ministry of Human Resource Development is currently in the process of
developing a comprehensive action plan on the inclusion of education of
children and youth with disabilities by consulting with experts, NGOs,
disability rights groups, parents’ groups and government bodies.
DEVELOPING NATIONAL POLICIES:
A
statement spelling out action areas was made in the Rajya Sabha by Shri Arjun
Singh, Minister for Human Resource Development, on 21 March 2005. He outlined
the framework of the Action Plan and listed the activities developed as a
result of the initial consultations. The plan covers the inclusion in education
of all children and young persons with disabilities by 2020.38
The main objectives of
the Plan are to:
• Ensure that no child
is denied admission to mainstream education;
• Ensure that every
child has the right to access an anganwadi and school and no child is turned
back on grounds of disability;
• Ensure that
mainstream and specialist training institutions serving persons with disabilities,
in both the government and non-governmental sectors, facilitate the growth of a
cadre of teachers trained to work within the principles of inclusion;
• Facilitate access of
girls with disabilities and disabled students from rural and remote areas to
government hostels;
• Provide home-based
learning for persons with severe, multiple and intellectual disability;
• Promote distance
education for those who require an individualised pace of learning;
• Emphasise job
training and job-orientated vocational training;
• Promote an
understanding of the paradigm shift from charity to development through a
massive awareness, motivational and sensitisation campaign (World Bank, 2007).
Policies
needed
|
Steps for
execution
|
1. A flexible
national
curriculum
|
1. Develop
means of making
the curriculum accessible to all
|
2. Primary
education is free to all
|
2. Disabled
pupils and their parents are actively encouraged to enrol
|
3. Sufficient
school places and teachers available
|
3. All
teachers are trained in inclusive teaching and learning
|
4.
Pupil-centred pedagogy whereall can progress at their optimum pace is
encouraged
|
4. Curriculum
materials are made accessible
|
5. Assessment
systems are made flexible to include all learners
|
5. Children
learn and are assessed in ways that suit them best
|
6. Specialist
teachers are made available to support mainstream
|
6. Innovative
ways found to expand support for learning
|
7. Sufficient
capital for school building and modification
|
7. Programmes
developed to mobilise communities to build environments
|
|
|
The various departments at central government
level are in the process of developing their work plans. The roles and responsibilities
of the implementing agencies and their partners, and the roles of NGOs and
parent groups are also being drafted. Monitoring guidelines and performance
indicators are being reviewed. The role of special schools, special educators
and other support professionals is being assessed within the changing scenario.
It is clear that education policy in India has gradually increased the focus on
disabled children and adults, and that inclusive education in regular schools
has become a prime policy objective. In June 2008, the Government of India, as
part of implementing its inclusive education programme, increased resources to
support a range of disabled pupils in completing four years of secondary
education. This will include students with learning difficulties, mental illness,
autism, cerebral palsy, blindness, low vision, leprosy, hearing impairment and loco-motor
impairments. It will include a child-specific allowance for support for
teachers in specialised teaching styles and identification.
Developing
activities for a whole school Approach –
• Identifying,
unlocking and using resources in the community;
• Producing aids and
equipment from local low-cost materials;
• Allocating resources
to support the learning of all students;
• Listening to
teachers, offering support, promoting team teaching and offering relevant
practical training;
• Making environments
accessible and welcoming;
• Developing and
implementing policy to respond to diversity and reduce discrimination;
• Developing
child-to-child and peer tutoring;
• Creating links with
community organisations and programmes, disabled people’s organisations and
parents’ associations;
• Community-based
rehabilitation programmes. Proposed solutions to this gender imbalance include:
• More research on
enrolment, outcomes and barriers to education for disabled girls;
• Explicit inclusion of
disabled girls in all policies and programmes for girls and for all disabled
children;
• A comprehensive
approach to the prevention of violence against disabled girls, including
widespread sex education;
• Targeted outreach to
parents to ensure that disabled girls have access to education;
• Targeted scholarships
for disabled girls;
• Teacher education
that includes training on gender and disability;
• Recruitment of
disabled women educators;
• More programmes
specifically designed for disabled girls that include access to role models and
self-advocacy skills, a focus on assets and parent involvement.
Key
factors in the development of inclusive education:
In a recent article
assessing progress towards inclusive education around the world, Miles (2007)
identifies ten key issues to be addressed in making progress in developing
inclusive education in the South.
1. Conducting a
situational analysis – identifying existing resources and initiatives and
highlighting the way forward.
2. Creating an
inclusive learning environment – learning environ ments are often not conducive
to the inclusion of disabled children. the community and resources need to be mobilised
to transform the situation.
3. Teacher education
and ongoing development – teachers are the most valuable resource in the
promotion of inclusive practice, but if they do not believe in inclusion they
can be a major barrier. They often lack confidence and the basic knowledge to
welcome disabled children. They need adequate training to change attitudes and
develop good practice.
4. Child-to-child
principles hold that children can play a vital role in their own education and
the education of their peers.
5. Parents and the
community are a valuable human resource
Conclusion: Inclusion through school improvement – there
is a need to improve education for
all; changes in practice and thinking that
accommodate disabled children will lead to benefits for all. It is important to
make sure that disabled children’s needs are part of general policy. Early childhood development and education
for disabled children can reduce the
disabling impacts of impairment. Economic empowerment and poverty reduction are
directly linked to the progress of
inclusive education. There are strong
cost-effectiveness and economic arguments for education for all in inclusive settings.The role of special schools is a
historical reality, but ways need to
be found to unleash their resources and the expertise of their staff for the benefit of the majority of disabled children who are not in school.
With
out the involvement of disabled people, there is a danger that policy
implementers will fail. Disability movements in every country need training to
understand these complexities, so that they can become advocates for inclusive
education at all levels. Parents of
disabled children have often been in the vanguard of struggling for the full
human rights and inclusion of their disabled children. Often it is only parents
who see the essential humanity in their children through their love for them.
All too often that relationship is broken by outside interventions. States should
work in alliance with these parents and their organisations. Parents need
training, support and empowerment so that they can become allies of their
children in their struggle for human rights.
Suggestions:
1. Links
and bridges need to be built between special schools and inclusive education
practices. Linkages also need to be established between community-based
rehabilitation programmes and inclusive education.
2. Public
policies, supportive legislation and budgetary allocations should not be based
on incidence, but on prevalence of special education needs, and take into
consideration the backlog created as a result of decades of neglect.
3. The
existing dual ministry responsibilities should be changed. Education of
children with disabilities should be the responsibility of the Department of
Education. The Ministry of Welfare should confine itself to support activities
only.
4. Inclusion
without ‘adequate’ preparation of general schools will not yield satisfactory
results. It is essential that issues related to infrastructural facilities,
curriculum modification and educational materials should be addressed.
5. Regular
evaluation should be based on performance indicators specified in the
implementation programme, and accountability for effective implementation at
all levels should be ensured.
6. There
should be emphasis on bottom-up, school-based interventions as part of regular education programmes following inclusive
strategies. The programme should be based stakeholder participation, community
mobilization, and mobilization of NGO, private and government resources.
7. The
training of general teachers at pre-service and in-service levels should
address the issue of education of children with disabilities, so that teachers
are better equipped to work in an inclusive environment. Some of the issues in
training that need to be addressed include the methodology to be adopted for
identifying children with disabilities; classroom management; use of
appropriate teaching methodologies; skills for adapting the curriculum;
development of teaching–learning materials that are multi-sensory in nature;
evaluation of learning; etc. The time has come to scale up successful
experiments on teacher training such as the Multi-site Action Research Project
and the Indian adaptation of the UNESCO Teacher Education Resource Pack, since
these experiences are lying dormant.
References:
1. Booth,
T. et al. (2001). Index to Measure the Impact of Inclusive Education. CSIE,
UK.CABE (1994). Xxx. Central Advisory Board of Education, Ministry of Human
ResourceDevelopment, New Delhi
2. NCERT
(1998). Sixth All-India Educational Survey. National Council of Educational
Research and Training, New Delhi.
3. MHRD
(1986). National Policy on Education. Ministry of Human Resource
Development,New Delhi.
4. MHRD
(1992). National Policy on Education. Ministry of Human Resource
Development,New Delhi.
5. UNESCO
(1996). Resource Teacher Education Resource Pack: Special Needs in the
Classroom.UNESCO, Paris .
6. Verma,
J. (2002). An Evaluation of IEDC in DPEP and Non-DPEP Districts. National
Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), New Delhi.
7.
Singal, N. (2006b). An ecosystemic approach for understanding
inclusive education: An Indian case study. European Journal of Psychology of
Education, Special issue: Ten years after Salamanca, XXI (3): p. 239-252.
8.
Tilak, J.B.G. (2005). Post-elementary education, poverty and
development in India. Paper presented at the 8th UKFIET International
Conference on Education and Development: Learning and livelihoods. Oxford: UK.
9.
Thomas, P. (2005). Mainstreaming disability in development:
India country report. Availablfrom: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSARREGTOPLABSOCPRO/1211714-1144074285477/20873614/IndiaReportDFID.pdf
Thomas, G. and O’ Hanlon, C. (2001). Series editors Preface. In G.
Thomas, and A. Loxley (Eds.), Deconstructing Special Education and
Constructing Inclusion.
Very informative paper
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing such great information. can you help me in finding out more detail on Schools In Gurgaon
Thank you for sharing this wonderful blog. Keep sharing such kinds of informative blogs.
ReplyDeleteScope of Professional Courses
Thank you for shedding light on Inclusive Education in India and Effective Classroom Practices. It's inspiring to see the commitment to diverse learning environments. Also, kudos to top schools in BTM Layout for championing inclusive education!
ReplyDelete